Does anyone know of an ontology I can use to describe a database (in this case, it is a bibliographic database); thus:

<#1233> a ex:ResearchDatabase .

asked 11 Sep '11, 16:02

brinxmat's gravatar image

brinxmat
1.4k212
accept rate: 15%


Here are a couple of relevant class URIs:

As per the first definition, void:Dataset is only appropriate if the database you're describing is available as RDF. dcmitype:Dataset is a more general class which could be applied to RDF data, SQL databases and any other structured data.

Addition: you could further qualify it as a bibliographic database like this:

:my_database a dcmitype:Dataset ;
    dcterms:subject <http://purl.org/NET/decimalised#010> .

<http://purl.org/NET/decimalised#010> a skos:Concept ;
    skos:prefLabel "Bibliography"@en .
permanent link

answered 12 Sep '11, 03:12

tobyink's gravatar image

tobyink ♦
5.2k312
accept rate: 26%

edited 12 Sep '11, 08:42

Good point — I can't say anything about the data in most cases, so a neutral dcmitype:Dataset is a good compromise.

(12 Sep '11, 03:42) brinxmat brinxmat's gravatar image

We use the following class URIs to model our (mostly) bibliographic databases:

  • void:Dataset - because (a subset of) the database content is mapped to RDF Triples and each record has its own URI
  • cdtype:CatalogueOrIndex - this concept best matches bibliographic databases. It is a subclass of dcmit:Collection
  • daia:Service - because our bibliographic databases are mostly library catalouges, which are provided by an Institution. The subclass daiaservice:Openaccess indicates that the database is freely available

I have not thought about dcmit:Dataset, as suggested by @tobyink, this makes sense too.

Have a look at the directory of some of our bibliographic databases: http://uri.gbv.de/database/.

Here is a nice visual example, including the connection of database and library institution:

permanent link

answered 13 Sep '11, 11:12

Jakob's gravatar image

Jakob
1.9k211
accept rate: 10%

These are good suggestions!

(14 Sep '11, 07:19) brinxmat brinxmat's gravatar image

The general case of an ontology to refer to a database is very... general. The D2RQ mapping language is designed to describe relational databases in RDF terms, and there is some work at the W3C (http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110324/) toward a version of that that is not specific to D2RQ.

If you're really looking for a bibliography ontology, check out Frédérick Giasson and Bruce D'Arcus's Bibliographic Ontology at http://bibliontology.com.

permanent link

answered 11 Sep '11, 20:44

bobdc's gravatar image

bobdc
4.1k7
accept rate: 15%

1

BIBO has no class for this purpose, since a bibliographic database isn't (oddly?) something that you'd cite.

From my own investigation void:Dataset is closest.

(12 Sep '11, 03:10) brinxmat brinxmat's gravatar image
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×663
×261

question asked: 11 Sep '11, 16:02

question was seen: 1,038 times

last updated: 14 Sep '11, 07:19