|
Does anyone know of an ontology I can use to describe a database (in this case, it is a bibliographic database); thus: <#1233> a ex:ResearchDatabase . |
|
Here are a couple of relevant class URIs:
As per the first definition, void:Dataset is only appropriate if the database you're describing is available as RDF. dcmitype:Dataset is a more general class which could be applied to RDF data, SQL databases and any other structured data. Addition: you could further qualify it as a bibliographic database like this:
Good point — I can't say anything about the data in most cases, so a neutral dcmitype:Dataset is a good compromise. |
|
We use the following class URIs to model our (mostly) bibliographic databases:
I have not thought about dcmit:Dataset, as suggested by @tobyink, this makes sense too. Have a look at the directory of some of our bibliographic databases: http://uri.gbv.de/database/. Here is a nice visual example, including the connection of database and library institution:
|
|
The general case of an ontology to refer to a database is very... general. The D2RQ mapping language is designed to describe relational databases in RDF terms, and there is some work at the W3C (http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110324/) toward a version of that that is not specific to D2RQ. If you're really looking for a bibliography ontology, check out Frédérick Giasson and Bruce D'Arcus's Bibliographic Ontology at http://bibliontology.com. 1
BIBO has no class for this purpose, since a bibliographic database isn't (oddly?) something that you'd cite. From my own investigation void:Dataset is closest. |

