I got question about Protege OWL API, is it meant to be used for web applications only ?? I read somewhere that the Protege OWL API is much easier to deal with than the core API of protege. Is this right??

Thank you..

asked 12 Jul '12, 07:46

sam123's gravatar image

accept rate: 0%

I don't believe it to be the case that it's designed for web applications only. However, I have never found them particularly easy to work with and tend to avoid using them unless I'm specifically tinkering with Protege. imo, OWL-API is a better bet if you're looking to build an OWL based application, and either Jena or Sesame if you're fine with just RDF.

permanent link

answered 12 Jul '12, 14:31

mhgrove's gravatar image

accept rate: 29%

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 12 Jul '12, 07:46

question was seen: 1,981 times

last updated: 31 Oct '12, 10:18