I'm extracting a SKOS lexicon automatically from a site, and I'm having some issues. To validate the file I'm using the online validator and Protege. Some examples of valid SKOS files are available here. These files are valid and open correctly on Protege. However, these files contain OWL definitions, which don't seem useful in my context.
My SKOS file is marked as valid by the online validator, but when I load in Protege I can't see any content (I only see a "thing" root node). How can I debug the file to figure out what's wrong with it? Are there other resources to validate and debug SKOS files?
Thanks for any hint!
asked 23 Aug '12, 07:11
Well, I'm going to suggest taking a look at TopBraid products (disclosure - I work for TopQuadrant). You can try to open the file in TopBraid Composer (download here), which is a general Semantic technology IDE. Enterprise Vocabulary Net is a SKOS-based vocabulary editor and application server. EVN is a server product, but you can get a preview by downloading Composer-ME and opening it on a localhost address in any browser. Both of these products should be able to display the SKOS file. "Debugging" will depend on what may be wrong. The association view, choosing skos:broader, skos: narrower, etc. will display the property hierarchy - same as rdfs:subClassOf, but using the property instead. You can add the skos relationships you need in either editors.
There are elements of OWL in SKOS. skos:transitiveProperty, for example. And OWL is fully compatible with SKOS, so I'm not sure this should be a big issue for you. Depends on the details..
answered 24 Aug '12, 00:00
In any case, Protégé is really for dealing with complex OWL ontologies involving lots of class axioms and such and not (originally) designed for processing individuals. @scott gives a good suggestion for an alternative tool in his answer (ahem).
Other possibilities for dedicated SKOS tools are listed here.
Actually, the SKOS specification is independent from OWL. If your SKOS file has OWL definitions, that is a choice of the author and it has nothing to do with SKOS itself. You can check for those in an OWL validator, as it seems you already did.
I have been using PoolParty's online consistency checker quite successfully. Pretty much all RDF serialization formats are accepted. A minor problem is that if your SKOS file has more than one instance of the same type of error (e.g. double skos:prefLabel on the same language), it will spot only the first one it finds. You must then correct it and run the consistency checker again in order to find the next one.
answered 29 Jan '13, 07:07