|
Linked data is a way (style) of publishing data on the web? or is a kind of data? |
|
The term "linked data" is used for both things: it's a set of principles, yes, but it's also common to refer to any data published using those principles as linked data. A word of advice: don't get too hung up on dictionary definitions, it's far more important that you understand the concepts involved. |
|
My own attempt at the dictionary definitions, so you can read about them and not have to worry about them afterwards:
These terms did not come about as rigorously defined terminology, and as such, people use the terms loosely ... the above definitions are probably not comprehensive in how people use those terms (e.g., LOD is now often used to refer to Linked Open Data: Linked Data with liberal licencing). As others have said, understanding the concepts is more important than understanding the definitions. If you understand the concepts, you can then pick up the intended meaning of such a term from the context of whatever is being said. |
|
I'm not entirely clear on what you mean by "kind of data". (eg. qualitive vs quantitive, healthcare vs government etc. ) Regardless, I would call it a way /style / method / set of best practices for publishing data on the web. see - http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/2127/historical-perspective-on-linked-data esp. http://tomheath.com/papers/bizer-heath-berners-lee-ijswis-linked-data.pdf EDIT: and the resultant data is also referred to as linked data. I'm guessing thats what you meant by "kind of data". It is linked data by virtue of being published using linked data best practrices but i'd certainly echo Jeen's advice on not getting too worried about the definitions etc. |


What do you think? Have you looked around on the Web for some authoritative definitions? For example on http://linkeddata.org/ ?
I am a little confused about it.
I think it's a way to publish data on the web. And publishing data in this way makes the web of data. Is it right?